sehr beliebt, daher gibt es in Prag eine gute Auswahl an Casinos. Im "Casino Bohemia" können Sie Ihr Glück beim Roulette, Poker oder Blackjack versuchen. Bohemia Casino ist nur für Spieler aus der Slowakei. Ich hab mich dennoch umgesehen und gib dir einen Einblick in das regionale Casino von Unibet. Beste Böhmen Casino-Hotels: Auf Tripadvisor finden Sie Bewertungen von Reisenden, authentische Reisefotos und Top-Angebote für 16 Böhmen.
Bohemia Casino BewertungBohemia Casino ist auf Rang 0 von Casinos auf LCB insgesamt und hat eine durchschnittliche Bewertung von bei 31 abgegebenen. Beste Böhmen Casino-Hotels: Auf Tripadvisor finden Sie Bewertungen von Reisenden, authentische Reisefotos und Top-Angebote für 16 Böhmen. Wir haben Bohemia Casino gründlich überprüft und diesem Casino eine perfekte Reputationsbewertung gegeben. Dies ist die beste.
Visit Read More. Bonuses No deposit Free spins Bonus code Review Facts about Bohemia Casino Discussion. No deposit bonuses Currently Bohemia Casino does not offer any no deposit bonuses.
The welcome bonus from Bohemia Casino does not contain any free spins. Frequently asked questions about Bohemia Casino Is Bohemia Casino currently offering a no deposit bonus?
Who owns Bohemia Casino? Bohemia Casino is owned by iGame Malta Ltd. What are Bohemia Casino sister sites?
Bohemia Casino is owned by iGame Malta Ltd and has the following sister sites: Bohemia Casino has no sister sites.
Visit Bohemia Casino. Instant Play , Live Casino , Live Chat , Mobile Friendly , New casino , SSL encryption. Baccarat , Blackjack , Poker , Roulette , Slots , Table games.
Have you found a relevant complaint about this casino, or do you have personal bad experience? Help others and submit your complaint.
All our reviews and guides are created honestly, according to the best knowledge and judgement of the members of our independent expert team; however, they are intended for informative purposes only and should not be construed as, nor relied upon as, legal advice.
You should always make sure that you meet all regulatory requirements before playing in any selected casino. Check your inbox and click the link we sent to: youremail gmail.
Find alternative casinos. Casino is already closed. Find alternatives. Author: Matej Novota This review was last updated: TZ.
Read more Read less. Interesting Facts Big online gambling company online since Positives Popular progressive jackpot slots. Negatives Limited choice of game genres.
Casinos related to Bohemia Casino 11 8. Complaints about Bohemia Casino and related casinos 35 We have conducted extensive research on the web and as a result we have found following 35 complaints on Bohemia Casino or any brands that might be interconnected with it.
Complaints on related Casinohuone Same owner. Insufficient evidence from casino. Black points: 35 for this casino.
The casino claimed they were unable to identify the player as a real person. The player continued on playing and all of a sudden got an error and when they tried to log back into the account, it was locked for the next hours and needed to contact the casino's support.
The casino asked them to send in all kinds of documents for verification and they did so straight away. After that, the casino claimed that they were unable to identify the player as a real person and once they would be done with a KYC process, they would pay the player their winning.
They never gave an update to the complaint and it remained unresolved. Read more on: askgamblers. Read more.
Failed self-exclusion. Black points: 77 for this casino. Player tried to receive their deposit funds back to the self-exclusion at the casino's sister site.
The player opened an account and soon after that, they found out that the casino belonged to the same casino group from which they had self-excluded themself before.
They then contacted the casino and asked for a refund of their deposit but they didn't react to their request nor the complaint itself. There's no other information available ever since.
Read more on: thepogg. Black points: 20 for this casino. The player was accused by the casino to had abused the system and confiscated all of his funds.
The player played at the casino and used a refer-a-friend bonus to gain NOK1, in addition to his NOK initial deposit but the casino blocked his account and accused him of abusing the system and confiscated all of his money.
The player admitted there might've been some activity seen as suspicious with his friend he had referred, but he wanted his NOKdeposit back.
The casino only provided a vague statement with terms they claim the player breached and won't comment any further.
Disputed amount: kr real money. Uncertain case, good regulator. Black points: 14 for this casino. The player was accused of having opened two accounts but the casino allowed him to continue playing.
The player used a bonus and won NOK58, However, he was denied his withdrawal and accused with opening two accounts. There is no update on this case and it remains unresolved.
Disputed amount: 58, kr bonus money. No reaction, good regulator. Black points: 60 6 for this casino. Player wasn't able to provide documents for verification.
The player couldn't pass the account verification because they were unable to provide utility bills since they were renting not owning a place.
The casino refused to respond to the complaint and it remains unresolved. Disputed amount:?? Black points: 0. The player's account was closed without an explanation.
After winning a couple of hundred euros, the player was asked to provide documents for verification, which they did right away.
Unfortunately, later on, their account was closed and their winnings were confiscated without an explanation. The player wasn't aware of breaking any rules or terms.
The casino became unresponsive and the complaint remained unresolved. Bonus abuse accusation, deposit returned. Player complained that upon his registration he had to pass through the verification checks first, then he made a deposit and used a bonus.
He won some money and asked for a withdrawal. He was asked for further verification documents which he provided but later his account was suspended and he was accused of a bonus abuse.
Casino proposed to return his deposit. Player refused any bonus abuse accusations. Proofs couldn't be shown. No more update since then.
Black points: 24 2 for this casino. The player's account was closed due to the irrelevant situation. The player complained that she had passed through all the verifications checks upon sign up.
She then received an email from the casino informing her about new rules with which she didn't agree and asked for her account to be closed.
However, she was unable to withdraw the remaining funds because the casino required more documents for verification and they replied that the player had already received an explanation this situation by email and asked the player to provide additional documents for verification.
The casino tried to reach her via phone but she said she usually didn't answer to unknown numbers. Complaints on related 32Red Casino Same owner.
Black points: for this casino. The player wasn't able to provide sufficient enough documents for verification and his account remained closed and his deposit was returned to him.
He was asked by the casino to provide the information where did the funds that he played with came from. He provided this document where it stated that his daughter provided the funds for him.
The player decided to take the legal steps to have this matter resolved. The case remains unresolved. He sent everything in and waited for the casino to respond.
After that, the player contacted the customer service on a few occasions and was told that the security team was checking his documents and they were not sure how long it was going to take them.
There is no further information available and the complaint remains unsolved. Black points: 11 for this casino.
The player failed the verification and their account was closed. The player requested a withdrawal and sent all the documents for verification, but they were insufficient and the casino confiscated their winnings and also decided to close their account.
The casino refused to communicate with the player, didn't react to this complaint and ever since then, it remains unsolved.
Black points: 8 for this casino. The player was accused of duplicate accounts, abused bonuses, and due to that, all the funds were seized.
After she had sent all the documents for verification, the casino accused her of double accounts and abused bonuses.
She insisted that there was a mistake due to the fact that she had only recently moved to a new apartment and perhaps this was the cause of misunderstanding.
The casino didn't want to accept the woman's words and refused to pay her the winning. Technical glitch. Black points: 80 2 for this casino.
The player's winnings were not accredited to them due to the technical difficulties while playing on the casino's mobile app. The player had an issue while he played a game on his casino's mobile app and the winnings were not credited to their account.
The player tried to resolve this issue with a support team and also wrote them an email but nothing changed. Casino advised the player to not to play this game until the technical problem would be resolved.
There is no further information on this case. Black points: 60 1 for this casino. Player cannot request a withdrawal. The player is not able to withdraw his money for more than 2 weeks.
Black points: 27 1 for this casino. Player's winnings were confiscated due to a linked account accusation. Black points: 7 1 for this casino.
The player admitted to the chat representative that he had a gambling problem and asked to be self-excluded. The chat representative advised the player to send an email since he couldn't do so through a live chat.
He begged the casino to have his deposits returned to him because of his gambling addiction. The player contacted the UKGC.
There is no further information on the case. Read more on: casinomeister. Complaints on related Roxy Palace Casino Same owner. Player's account canceled, all funds confiscated.
The casino claimed it was due to a breach of terms and conditions. After winning some amount of money, the player's account was canceled and all their funds were confiscated.
This left the player frustrated but the casino claimed it was due to a breach of terms and conditions. No update since then. Player allegedly received a bonus they did not ask for.
According to the player they received a bonus they had never asked for and tried to cancel it. The casino informed the player since they had already started to wager, they had to finish the wagering requirements.
The player would have rather withdrawn their deposit. The complaint remained unresolved. Sin from the past. The casino claimed it was due to a duplicate account terms and conditions breach and an abusive behavior of the player.
The player complained their account was locked and all their funds were seized. According to the casino, the player had been already registered in a sister casino using a different identity.
After the casino locked the player's account, they behaved abusively which the player admits. Complaints on related Unibet Casino Same owner.
The player was asked to send documents for verification over and over again while his case remains unresolved. All the 24hbet casino's players accounts were transferred to Unibet casino.
The player created a new account with Unibet and provided all the documents needed for verification. With adding some additional documents, they were all approved.
After that, Hans asked the casino via email if he could receive the remaining balance from 24hbet casino. The casino responded stating that they need his ID and utility documents again, even though those were approved just recently.
When Hans asked the casino for an update, he kept receiving the same answer, to send the documents for verification again. Hans became very frustrated and this case remains open.
Black points: 22 for this casino. The player's winnings were canceled. Player said that he had asked the live chat about the reason why only part of his withdrawal request was approved and the other part was pending.
He was told that his account needs to be verified further and they needed to call him too. The casino called him and asked him some questions for verifications, however, the player said he had failed to answer correctly one question and his account got blocked.
Then his pending withdrawal was canceled and his deposit was returned to him. The casino replied by saying that the player had breached the terms and conditions but he denied these accusations saying he won fairly and that the casino had been seeking for reasons why not to pay him his winnings.
No more reaction from the casino, no more update since then.